Back in October, I started a series of posts about my senior thesis. My topic relates to how classical Christian schools should treat science education. It stems from something I have often noticed in classical Christian education, namely the lack of a focus or emphasis on science classes. This comes from both the teachers and the students in a school, as teachers do not always attempt to make science seem as exciting as other classes, and students often treat science classes as an afterthought.
Again, we see the opposite problem in much of public education. Science is overemphasized, often at the cost of history and the humanities. STEM education is the norm. There is a focus only on getting more students interested in science, whether or not the curriculum used is actually good.
My Position
Neither of these takes on science education allow science to flourish fully. This leads to my main question which is, “How should science education be treated in classical Christian schools?”
I hope in my paper to argue that science should return to the days of natural philosophy when it was a marriage between scientific facts and the liberal arts. My thesis statement has gone through some revision and is currently, “Science education in classical Christian schools should be reconciled with classical pedagogy because these two studies rely on each other to create students who are well-rounded.”
My three main points are:
-
Classical education provides the integration that is crucial to fully understanding science.
-
Science education is necessary in order for classical education to create well-rounded students.
-
The study of science teaches students to care for and appreciate God’s creation, which should be a goal of classical education.
Ooh we get a preview! Can’t wait to see you present this in the Spring 🙂
Yes! Thanks! I’m excited to present too, but a bit nervous 🙂